How Extractivist Is the "Commodities Country"?
A Biophysical Look at Brazil's Trade Balance (1971–2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69585/2595-6892.2026.1334Keywords:
socioeconomic metabolism, unequal ecological exchange, physical trade balanceAbstract
This paper examines the profile of Brazil’s foreign trade between 1971 and
2023, with a particular focus on the biophysical trade balance—defined as the
difference between biophysical imports and biophysical exports—categorized
into biomass, fossil fuels, metallic minerals, and non-metallic minerals. The
analysis spans more than five decades, a time frame broad enough to capture
distinct cycles of Brazilian economic growth. Grounded in the theoretical
perspectives of unequal ecological exchange and neo-extractivism, and
employing the methodological framework of socio-economic metabolism,
the results indicate a significant increase in the deficit of the biophysical
trade balance. This outcome underscores Brazil’s persistent role as a net
supplier of raw materials. The material intensity of trade flows followed
divergent trajectories: while the material intensity of Brazilian exports
increased—signaling a devaluation per unit of mass—the material intensity
of imports declined. This dynamic, characterized by the rising material
burden of exports in contrast to the relative “dematerialization” of imports,
is captured by the π ratio and highlights a deterioration in the material and
sustainability dimensions of Brazil’s integration into global trade flows,
consistent with a worsening of the ecological inequality embedded in the
country’s foreign trade.
References
ABREU, M. P. (org.). A Ordem do Progresso: Dois Séculos de Política Econômica no Brasil. 2. ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Elsevier, 2014
ALONSO-FERNÁNDEZ, Pablo; REGUEIRO-FERREIRA, Rosa María. Extractivism, ecologically
unequal exchange and environmental impact in South America: A study using Material Flow Analysis
(1990–2017). Ecological Economics, v. 194, p. 107351, 2022
ARAÚJO, A. H. S.; ANDRADE, D. C.; SOUZA, H. F. Metabolismo socioeconômico (mse): construção
conceitual e convergência com a economia ecológica (ee). Revista Iberoamericana de Economía
Ecológica, v. 31, n. 1, p. 127-143, 2019
ARAÚJO, V. L.; MATTOS, F. A. M. (org.). A economia brasileira de Getúlio a Dilma: Novas interpretações.
São Paulo: Hucitec, 2021
AYRES, R. Resources, environment, and economics: applications of the materials/energy balance
principle. New York: Wiley, 1978
BLACK, C. Termos de troca e crescimento econômico no Brasil. Indicadores Econômicos FEE, v. 45,
n. 4, p. 27-40, 2018
BRESSER-PEREIRA, L.C. Quase estagnação no Brasil e o novo desenvolvimentismo. Revista de
Economia Política, v. 42, n. 2, p. 503-531, 2022
BUESCU, M. História econômica do Brasil. 1. ed. São Paulo: Apec, 1970
CARLO, G. ¿Por qué es importante la ecología política? Nueva sociedad, v. 244, p. 47-60, 2013
DALY, H. E. Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996
DORNINGER, C. Bio-physical North-South trade as an unequal ecological exchange. Tese de Doutorado.
Institute for Social Ecology-AAU, Viena, 2014
DWECK, E.; OLIVEIRA, A. L. M.; ROSSI, P. (org.). Austeridade e retrocesso: impactos sociais da política
fiscal no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasil Debate; Fundação Friedrich Ebert, 2018
FERNANDES, F. R. C.; ARAUJO, E. R. Mineração no Brasil: crescimento econômico e conflitos ambientais.
2016. Disponível em: <http://mineralis.cetem.gov.br/bitstream/cetem/1909/1/conflitos_ambientais_
cap.2%20p65.pdf>. [Acesso em: 06/02/2022]
FISCHER-KOWALSKI, M.; WEISZ, H. Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward
a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, p. 215-251, 1999
FURTADO, C. Formação econômica do Brasil. 32. ed. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 2005
GALEANO, E. As veias abertas da América Latina. Tradução de Sergio Faraco. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2010
GUDYNAS, E. Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos: Las ambivalencias del progresismo
sudamericano. Nueva sociedad, n. 237, p. 128-146, 2012
GUDYNAS, E. Extracciones, extractivismos y extrahecciones. Un marco conceptual sobre la
apropiación de recursos naturales. Observatorio del desarrollo, v. 18, p. 1-18, 2013
HABERL, H. et al. Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nature
Sustainability, v. 2, n. 3, p. 173-184, 2019
INFANTE-AMATE, J.; URREGO-MESA, A.; PINERO, P.; TELLO, E. The open veins of Latin America:
Long-term physical trade flows (1900–2016). Global Environmental Change, v. 76, p. 102579, 2022
KRAUSMANN, F. et al. Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century
and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 114, n. 8,
p. 1880-1885, 2017
LACERDA, A. C. et al. (org.). Economia brasileira. 5. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação AS, 2017
LITTLE, P. E. Environments and environmentalisms in anthropological research: facing a new
millennium. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 28, p. 253-284, 1999
LITTLE, P. E. Ecologia política como etnografia: um guia teórico e metodológico. Horizontes
antropológicos, v. 12, p. 85-103, 2006
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. Ecología política del extractivismo y justicia socio-ambiental. Interdisciplina, v. 3,
n. 7, p. 57-73, 2015
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J.; WALTER, M. Social metabolism and conflicts over extractivism. In: CASTRO,
Fabio de; HOGENBOOM, Barbara; BAUD, Michiel (orgs.). Environmental governance in Latin America.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 58-85, 2016
PEINADO, G. Intercambio ecológicamente desigual e Intercambio desigual en Oscar Braun: nexos,
puntos en común y especificidades. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, v. 24, p. 187-202, 2015
PEINADO, G. Inserción internacional e intercambio ecológicamente desigual: el desarrollo de un
subdesarrollo desigual e insustentable en Argentina. Dissertação de Mestrado em Economia. FLACSO,
Buenos Aires, 2019
PÉREZ-RINCÓN, M. A. Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: towards an
ecological “Prebisch thesis”. Ecological Economics, v. 59, n. 4, p. 519-529, 2006
PINAR, E. P. El neoextractivismo en América Latina. 2020. Disponível em: <http://rua.ua.es/dspace/
handle/10045/108389>. [Acesso em: 02/12/2021]
PREBISCH, R. O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e alguns de seus problemas
principais. In: BIELSCHOWSKY, Ricardo (org.). Cinquenta anos de pensamento na Cepal. Rio de
Janeiro: Record/Cepal, v. 1, p. 69-136, 2000
RICE, J. Ecological unequal exchange: Consumption, equity, and unsustainable structural relationships
within the global economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 43-72, 2007
ROCHA, J. S.; OLIVEIRA, N. A.; NOLASCO, L. G. Breve análise da evolução técnico-científica da Vale.
Revista Jurídica Direito, Sociedade e Justiça, v. 6, n. 8, 2019
RODRIGUES, D. A. Os investimentos no Brasil nos anos 90: cenários setorial e regional. Rio de Janeiro:
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, 2000
SAES, B. M. Ecologically unequal exchange: the renewed interpretation of Latin American debates by
the Barcelona School. In: VILLAMAYOR-TOMAS, Sergio; MURADIAN, Roldan (orgs.). The Barcelona
School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology: a companion in honour of Joan Martínez-Alier.
Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 147-155, 2023
SCHANDL, H. et al. Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence. Journal
of Industrial Ecology, v. 22, n. 4, p. 827-838, 2018
SINGH, S. J.; TALWAR, S.; SHENOY, M. Why Socio-metabolic Studies are Central to Ecological
Economics. Ecology, Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 21-43, 2021
SVAMPA, M. N. Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. 2013.
Disponível em: <http://nuso.org/articulo/consenso-de-los-commodities-y-lenguajes-de-valoracionen-
america-latina/>. [Acesso em: 02/07/2023]
SVAMPA, M. N. As fronteiras do neoextrativismo na América Latina: conflitos socioambientais, giro
ecoterritorial e novas dependências. Tradução de Lígia Azevedo. São Paulo: Elefante, 2019
WARLENIUS, R. Linking ecological debt and ecologically unequal exchange: stocks, flows, and
unequal sink appropriation. Journal of Political Ecology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 364-380, 2016
WEISZ, H. et al. The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and
determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, v. 58, n. 4, p. 676-698, 2006
WEST, J.; SCHANDL, H. Material use and material efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Ecological Economics, v. 94, p. 19-27, 2013
WOLF, E. Ownership and political ecology. Anthropological quarterly, v. 45, n. 3, p. 201-205, 1972
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


