How Extractivist Is the "Commodities Country"?

A Biophysical Look at Brazil's Trade Balance (1971–2023)

Authors

  • Anderson Henrique dos Santos Araújo Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Daniel Caixeta Andrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69585/2595-6892.2026.1334

Keywords:

socioeconomic metabolism, unequal ecological exchange, physical trade balance

Abstract

This paper examines the profile of Brazil’s foreign trade between 1971 and
2023, with a particular focus on the biophysical trade balance—defined as the
difference between biophysical imports and biophysical exports—categorized
into biomass, fossil fuels, metallic minerals, and non-metallic minerals. The
analysis spans more than five decades, a time frame broad enough to capture
distinct cycles of Brazilian economic growth. Grounded in the theoretical
perspectives of unequal ecological exchange and neo-extractivism, and
employing the methodological framework of socio-economic metabolism,
the results indicate a significant increase in the deficit of the biophysical
trade balance. This outcome underscores Brazil’s persistent role as a net
supplier of raw materials. The material intensity of trade flows followed
divergent trajectories: while the material intensity of Brazilian exports
increased—signaling a devaluation per unit of mass—the material intensity
of imports declined. This dynamic, characterized by the rising material
burden of exports in contrast to the relative “dematerialization” of imports,
is captured by the π ratio and highlights a deterioration in the material and
sustainability dimensions of Brazil’s integration into global trade flows,
consistent with a worsening of the ecological inequality embedded in the
country’s foreign trade.

References

ABREU, M. P. (org.). A Ordem do Progresso: Dois Séculos de Política Econômica no Brasil. 2. ed. Rio de

Janeiro: Elsevier, 2014

ALONSO-FERNÁNDEZ, Pablo; REGUEIRO-FERREIRA, Rosa María. Extractivism, ecologically

unequal exchange and environmental impact in South America: A study using Material Flow Analysis

(1990–2017). Ecological Economics, v. 194, p. 107351, 2022

ARAÚJO, A. H. S.; ANDRADE, D. C.; SOUZA, H. F. Metabolismo socioeconômico (mse): construção

conceitual e convergência com a economia ecológica (ee). Revista Iberoamericana de Economía

Ecológica, v. 31, n. 1, p. 127-143, 2019

ARAÚJO, V. L.; MATTOS, F. A. M. (org.). A economia brasileira de Getúlio a Dilma: Novas interpretações.

São Paulo: Hucitec, 2021

AYRES, R. Resources, environment, and economics: applications of the materials/energy balance

principle. New York: Wiley, 1978

BLACK, C. Termos de troca e crescimento econômico no Brasil. Indicadores Econômicos FEE, v. 45,

n. 4, p. 27-40, 2018

BRESSER-PEREIRA, L.C. Quase estagnação no Brasil e o novo desenvolvimentismo. Revista de

Economia Política, v. 42, n. 2, p. 503-531, 2022

BUESCU, M. História econômica do Brasil. 1. ed. São Paulo: Apec, 1970

CARLO, G. ¿Por qué es importante la ecología política? Nueva sociedad, v. 244, p. 47-60, 2013

DALY, H. E. Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996

DORNINGER, C. Bio-physical North-South trade as an unequal ecological exchange. Tese de Doutorado.

Institute for Social Ecology-AAU, Viena, 2014

DWECK, E.; OLIVEIRA, A. L. M.; ROSSI, P. (org.). Austeridade e retrocesso: impactos sociais da política

fiscal no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasil Debate; Fundação Friedrich Ebert, 2018

FERNANDES, F. R. C.; ARAUJO, E. R. Mineração no Brasil: crescimento econômico e conflitos ambientais.

2016. Disponível em: <http://mineralis.cetem.gov.br/bitstream/cetem/1909/1/conflitos_ambientais_

cap.2%20p65.pdf>. [Acesso em: 06/02/2022]

FISCHER-KOWALSKI, M.; WEISZ, H. Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward

a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Advances in Human Ecology, p. 215-251, 1999

FURTADO, C. Formação econômica do Brasil. 32. ed. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 2005

GALEANO, E. As veias abertas da América Latina. Tradução de Sergio Faraco. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2010

GUDYNAS, E. Estado compensador y nuevos extractivismos: Las ambivalencias del progresismo

sudamericano. Nueva sociedad, n. 237, p. 128-146, 2012

GUDYNAS, E. Extracciones, extractivismos y extrahecciones. Un marco conceptual sobre la

apropiación de recursos naturales. Observatorio del desarrollo, v. 18, p. 1-18, 2013

HABERL, H. et al. Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nature

Sustainability, v. 2, n. 3, p. 173-184, 2019

INFANTE-AMATE, J.; URREGO-MESA, A.; PINERO, P.; TELLO, E. The open veins of Latin America:

Long-term physical trade flows (1900–2016). Global Environmental Change, v. 76, p. 102579, 2022

KRAUSMANN, F. et al. Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century

and require half of annual resource use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 114, n. 8,

p. 1880-1885, 2017

LACERDA, A. C. et al. (org.). Economia brasileira. 5. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação AS, 2017

LITTLE, P. E. Environments and environmentalisms in anthropological research: facing a new

millennium. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 28, p. 253-284, 1999

LITTLE, P. E. Ecologia política como etnografia: um guia teórico e metodológico. Horizontes

antropológicos, v. 12, p. 85-103, 2006

MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. Ecología política del extractivismo y justicia socio-ambiental. Interdisciplina, v. 3,

n. 7, p. 57-73, 2015

MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J.; WALTER, M. Social metabolism and conflicts over extractivism. In: CASTRO,

Fabio de; HOGENBOOM, Barbara; BAUD, Michiel (orgs.). Environmental governance in Latin America.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 58-85, 2016

PEINADO, G. Intercambio ecológicamente desigual e Intercambio desigual en Oscar Braun: nexos,

puntos en común y especificidades. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, v. 24, p. 187-202, 2015

PEINADO, G. Inserción internacional e intercambio ecológicamente desigual: el desarrollo de un

subdesarrollo desigual e insustentable en Argentina. Dissertação de Mestrado em Economia. FLACSO,

Buenos Aires, 2019

PÉREZ-RINCÓN, M. A. Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: towards an

ecological “Prebisch thesis”. Ecological Economics, v. 59, n. 4, p. 519-529, 2006

PINAR, E. P. El neoextractivismo en América Latina. 2020. Disponível em: <http://rua.ua.es/dspace/

handle/10045/108389>. [Acesso em: 02/12/2021]

PREBISCH, R. O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e alguns de seus problemas

principais. In: BIELSCHOWSKY, Ricardo (org.). Cinquenta anos de pensamento na Cepal. Rio de

Janeiro: Record/Cepal, v. 1, p. 69-136, 2000

RICE, J. Ecological unequal exchange: Consumption, equity, and unsustainable structural relationships

within the global economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 43-72, 2007

ROCHA, J. S.; OLIVEIRA, N. A.; NOLASCO, L. G. Breve análise da evolução técnico-científica da Vale.

Revista Jurídica Direito, Sociedade e Justiça, v. 6, n. 8, 2019

RODRIGUES, D. A. Os investimentos no Brasil nos anos 90: cenários setorial e regional. Rio de Janeiro:

Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, 2000

SAES, B. M. Ecologically unequal exchange: the renewed interpretation of Latin American debates by

the Barcelona School. In: VILLAMAYOR-TOMAS, Sergio; MURADIAN, Roldan (orgs.). The Barcelona

School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology: a companion in honour of Joan Martínez-Alier.

Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 147-155, 2023

SCHANDL, H. et al. Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence. Journal

of Industrial Ecology, v. 22, n. 4, p. 827-838, 2018

SINGH, S. J.; TALWAR, S.; SHENOY, M. Why Socio-metabolic Studies are Central to Ecological

Economics. Ecology, Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 21-43, 2021

SVAMPA, M. N. Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. 2013.

Disponível em: <http://nuso.org/articulo/consenso-de-los-commodities-y-lenguajes-de-valoracionen-

america-latina/>. [Acesso em: 02/07/2023]

SVAMPA, M. N. As fronteiras do neoextrativismo na América Latina: conflitos socioambientais, giro

ecoterritorial e novas dependências. Tradução de Lígia Azevedo. São Paulo: Elefante, 2019

WARLENIUS, R. Linking ecological debt and ecologically unequal exchange: stocks, flows, and

unequal sink appropriation. Journal of Political Ecology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 364-380, 2016

WEISZ, H. et al. The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and

determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, v. 58, n. 4, p. 676-698, 2006

WEST, J.; SCHANDL, H. Material use and material efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Ecological Economics, v. 94, p. 19-27, 2013

WOLF, E. Ownership and political ecology. Anthropological quarterly, v. 45, n. 3, p. 201-205, 1972

Published

2026-09-01